Theoretically, this bike belongs to another bike.Or perhaps another bike "owns" it in the slang sense.
My husband claims it. His name is Michael but he at one time, had the nickname of "bikel" and so, if shortened would be "Bike"
So the bike doesn't really own the $9.99?
I guess I'm late to the party...I couldn't resist commenting on the inappropriate use of the apostrophe, either! That one kills me! And it's also almost as consistently funny as the misused quotation mark. Thanks for all the "laughs"! ;)
Post a Comment
4 comments:
Theoretically, this bike belongs to another bike.
Or perhaps another bike "owns" it in the slang sense.
My husband claims it. His name is Michael but he at one time, had the nickname of "bikel" and so, if shortened would be "Bike"
So the bike doesn't really own the $9.99?
I guess I'm late to the party...I couldn't resist commenting on the inappropriate use of the apostrophe, either! That one kills me! And it's also almost as consistently funny as the misused quotation mark.
Thanks for all the "laughs"! ;)
Post a Comment