Friday, February 26, 2010

tree"s? really?


That's right kids. It's a quotation mark masquerading as an unnecessary apostrophe. Thanks, DJ.

5 comments:

flask said...

oh, my goodness, gracious.

Jen Shikami said...

Maybe it's a double possessive!

Or, you know, not.

toep said...

it's an unnecessary conjoined apostrophe

toep said...

@Jen Shikami, double possessive? what would that BE, praytell?

Dr John S. Partington said...

Maybe it is the last part of a long quote - did anyone think to look on the other side of the page?