those are so damn ugly that i can only imagine hipsters wearing them ironically, maybe with tights and shorts. but a hipster would never set foot in a walmart.
OK guys and gals, they are for hunters. When hunting, warmth and camouflage are the priorities, not fashion. The only difference between those and the male version is size. However nowadays they are making pink rifles, pink pistols and pink compound bows!
"Agh!" All punctuation goes within the quote "marks!!!"
ReplyDeleteFor "her" sounds like it's for the mistress. I don't think "she" would be too happy with those boots!
ReplyDeleteHold on! Are those boots $27.64... or $87.43?
ReplyDeletesarah... do you really care how much ugly boots cost?
ReplyDeleteI think it means that if a female wears them, how feminine can she actually be?
ReplyDeletethose are so damn ugly that i can only imagine hipsters wearing them ironically, maybe with tights and shorts. but a hipster would never set foot in a walmart.
ReplyDeleteOK guys and gals, they are for hunters. When hunting, warmth and camouflage are the priorities, not fashion. The only difference between those and the male version is size. However nowadays they are making pink rifles, pink pistols and pink compound bows!
ReplyDeleteHipsters will go in a Wal-Mart, they'll just do so "ironically", to show how "indie" and "different" they are. And yes, my QMs were intentional.
ReplyDeletei can't imagine what kind of environment into which those boots would blend. other than The Pink Triangle, et al.
ReplyDeleteMakes me think of the video of "Men with Petite feet on Funny or die. http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/1efd0fc62a
ReplyDelete